HomeThe Closer Suite › Proposal & Quote Builder

For Sales Professionals

Proposal & Quote Builder

The proposal that closes costs their problem first.

Turns discovery notes into a proposal in the buyer's own words: the cost of their problem with the arithmetic shown, the same case rerun at 70% of their figures, and three pricing options engineered so the middle one wins.

Get this skill — US$19Type demo after install — watch it do the whole job first.

$19 one-time · instant download · works with Claude & ChatGPT

A Claude & ChatGPT SkillProposal & Quote Builder

Most proposals die for the same three reasons.

They go to one contact who then has to sell it internally without you. They arrive as a single take-it-or-leave-it number, so the only decision available is yes or no. And they're written in your language rather than the buyer's.

Then there's the fourth killer, the quiet one: no deadline. A proposal without a validity date doesn't get rejected, it just drifts, and drifting feels survivable right up until the quarter closes.

This fixes all four. It prices the buyer's problem from their own figures, runs the whole case again at 70% of those figures so a finance reader can't find the weak spot first, and ships a one-page version for the person who was never on the call.

One skill. Six jobs.

Build the proposal

Executive summary in the prospect's own vocabulary, the cost of their problem with the maths visible, the solution scoped as outcomes, three prices engineered so the middle one wins, and a next step with a real date.

› Turn these discovery notes into a proposal. [paste]

Stress-test your own numbers

The skeptic's column reruns every cost driver at 70% of what the prospect told you, line by line. In the demo, $35,100 a year becomes $24,570 — and the document says out loud where the case actually rests when the conservative figure doesn't clear year one.

› Show me the conservative case beside the headline number.

Write for the person who wasn't there

One page, five blocks, the recommended option only and no options table, because options help a champion decide and give an executive a reason to defer. Every figure is checked against the full proposal before it exports.

› Build the exec one-pager for the co-founder who wasn't on the call.

Prepare for the price conversation

A sheet only you see: the three first-year totals, the concession ladder with the arithmetic done, your walk-away floor printed, and the two questions to ask before conceding anything.

› Build my negotiation prep sheet for this deal.

Renew and expand

Results first, price second. The original outcomes against actuals with any missed target named before the wins, what changed on their side this year, and any price rise in the first line of the pricing block rather than buried on page three.

› They're up for renewal in October. Build it.

Rescue a quiet one

The autopsy runs eight classic death causes, rules each clear, suspect or guilty with evidence from the document, then writes the follow-up. No validity window on the original? It routes to a clean re-issue instead of inventing a deadline.

› They went quiet after I sent it. What's my next move?

A proposal and a quote that survives being forwarded alone.

Clean documents for your own letterhead, and the skill says out loud which ones the buyer sees:

Why not just ask the chatbot?

It argues against itself first

Every ROI figure came out of somebody's memory, and finance readers assume those were generous. So the case runs twice, driver by driver at 70%, with the verdict stated even when it's unflattering. A buyer who finds the weak case themselves stops believing the strong one.

It writes the second document

Death cause number one is a proposal sent to one contact. The fix isn't a better proposal; it's a one-page version aimed at the executive who never met you, carrying the recommended option and the decision date, with every figure reconciled against the long version.

It won't invent an input

Missing figures become [CONFIRM: x] in the draft rather than plausible fiction. Getting caught with a made-up number costs you the deal and the relationship, so the gaps stay visible until you close them.

Your first five minutes.

Install it, then type any of these. No prompt-writing, no setup screens.

  1. 1Turn these discovery notes into a proposal. [paste]
  2. 2Just a quick quote for [scope] — the fast version.
  3. 3Build the exec one-pager and my negotiation prep sheet.
  4. 4They went quiet after I sent it. What's my next move?
  5. 5demo — watch it price a $35,100-a-year problem.

Plug and play

From download to done in three steps.

i.

Buy & download

A skill folder and a one-page install guide. Claude and ChatGPT are both included.

ii.

Drop it in

About a minute, once. Then fill your profile — the same one every skill in the suite reads.

iii.

Just talk

Paste the job in front of you — an email, a brief, a spreadsheet. It runs the whole workflow and hands back a finished file.

What it won't do.

Every skill in the store ships with this section. If a tool won't tell you its limits, it's selling you something.

Questions.

What exactly is an AI skill?

A small file you add to Claude or ChatGPT once. It teaches the AI you already use this specific professional workflow — so from then on, one sentence runs the whole job. No prompt writing, no new app to learn. You buy it once, download it, and it's yours. It runs inside the Claude or ChatGPT account you already have; the free tiers work too.

How is this different from just asking Claude or ChatGPT?

A chatbot writes a nice-looking proposal. This applies a fixed structure: mirror their vocabulary, price the problem before the solution with visible arithmetic, run that case again at 70% to beat the skeptic to it, three options with the middle engineered to win, a dated next step and a 14-day validity window. Anything it doesn't have is flagged rather than invented.

Why would I show the buyer a weaker version of my own numbers?

Because they will build it themselves, silently, and trust nothing afterwards. Printing the conservative case first is what makes the headline number credible. In the demo the problem costs $35,100 a year on the prospect's own figures and $24,570 at 70% of them, and the document states plainly which part of the case the deal actually rests on.

What if I don't have detailed discovery notes?

It works from whatever you have and runs a five-question gap interview covering the inputs a cost-of-problem section can't be built without. Anything still missing appears as a [CONFIRM] marker in the draft, so you can see the gaps rather than ship them invisibly.

Does it handle pricing that isn't a flat project fee?

Yes. It picks the shape first — project, retainer, per unit, day rate, or performance-linked — and each shape carries its own requirement: milestones and exclusions, term and notice period, a worked example at your buyer's volume with a cap, a not-to-exceed figure, or a named measurement source. Every shape prints the first-year total, because the buyer's finance person will compute it anyway.

Is it a subscription?

No. $19 once, yours to keep, updates included. It runs inside the Claude or ChatGPT account you already have — the free tiers work too.

Works even better with the rest of the suite.

All 5 share one profile you fill in once. Get The Closer Suite for $59 and save $36.

The proposal that closes costs their problem first.

One held rate pays for this many times over. $19 once, yours to keep.

Get this skill — US$19